Recently, as my wife and I pulled out of a local mall onto the main thoroughfare, a small group of people was on the sidewalk exercising their civil rights by expressing their displeasure with a noted politician through signs and chants. While I sympathized with the group’s point of view and am grateful for the freedom of assembly and free speech afforded to us in the United States, I was dismayed by their attitude and approach.
Though I couldn’t hear the chants well over the traffic noise, the signs the group held made their agenda and attitude crystal clear. Rather than slogans like “Make love, not war.” or “Down with this and up with that.”, their message was simply “F so and so.” While I believe there is a time for what today is commonly called “Real Talk,” I also think the manner of our talk and action matters. As we turned toward the freeway, I couldn’t help but think that rather than persuading people to their point of view, the group’s approach was more likely to harden the position of those who disagree with them, thus widening the gap between fellow citizens, rendering genuine dialogue and exchange of ideas all but obsolete. And highly partisan news outlets and our social media algorithms aggressively reinforce this division. As we focus on these venues, we become entrenched in our opinions (no matter how well or ill-considered they may be), convinced our position is right and that those with whom we disagree are not only wrong, but possibly or even likely evil.
